Thread: "3^4 10:11.87 Speedsolve World Record [1 Attachment]"

--------------DBA7CFB0186EE628A9B14531
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hello Mannessah,

Congratulations on your solve! Yes, I'm sure that sub-10 minutes should be =
very possible. Maybe once someone achieves that I will need to start record=
ing their times in the HOF.

On a related note, I've been thinking of doing the same for the physical 2^=
4. If there's enough interest, I'll offer a prize. Please let me know if yo=
u are interested. I will commit to doing it if more than 3 people sign up. =
Either way, this is a good time to start working on your 4D finger tricks.

Happy puzzling!
-Melinda

On 5/4/2019 8:31 PM, timebug22@gmail.com [4D_Cubing] wrote:
> [Attachment(s) <#TopText> from timebug22@gmail.com [4D_Cubing] included b=
elow]
>
> Video proof: https://youtu.be/qyaYU6AV5Sg=C2=A0(Log file is attached)
>
> The previous record (as far as I could find) was 10:19.40 by Micheal Gott=
lieb / qqwref
>
> He seems to use a completely different method from mine. My method is Pet=
rus style blockbuilding with Sheerin-Zhao Last-Layer
>
> The solve itself is really nice, 559 moves , I wouldn't call it lucky exc=
ept maybe not getting RKT parity.
>
>
> There's a lot of room for improvement I think sub-10 minutes is definitel=
y possible=C2=A0 and I could see the record getting a lot faster than this.=
Especially if you could eliminate the long pause while looking for pieces,=
that seems to be the thing that's slowing the solve down the most is looki=
ng for pieces.
>
>
> I also didn't use any Macros, but that's because my method is mostly intu=
itive.
>
> I'd be really curious to know if anyone else has been speedsolving and wh=
at your time's are, or what methods you use.
>
>
> Move splits
>
> 2x2x2x2 55/55
>
> 2x2x2x3 41/96
>
> 2x2x3x3 56/153
>
> F2L=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0127/280
>
> OLC=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0110/390
>
> PLC=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0169/559
>
>
>
>
>
>=20


--------------DBA7CFB0186EE628A9B14531
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable



">


Hello Mannessah,



Congratulations on your solve! Yes, I'm sure that sub-10 minutes
should be very possible. Maybe once someone achieves that I will
need to start recording their times in the HOF.



On a related note, I've been thinking of doing the same for the
physical 2^4. If there's enough interest, I'll offer a prize. Please
let me know if you are interested. I will commit to doing it if more
than 3 people sign up. Either way, this is a good time to start
working on your 4D finger tricks.



Happy puzzling!

-Melinda

-8">

Video proof:=C2=A0 href=3D"https://youtu.be/qyaYU6AV5Sg" moz-do-not-send=3D"true">=
https://youtu.be/qyaYU6AV5Sg=C2=A0(Log
file is attached)

The previous record (as far as I could find) was 10:19.40 by
Micheal Gottlieb / qqwref

He seems to use a completely different method from mine. My
method is Petrus style blockbuilding with Sheerin-Zhao
Last-Layer

The solve itself is really nice, 559 moves , I wouldn't call it
lucky except maybe not getting RKT parity.

There's a lot of room for improvement I think sub-10 minutes is
definitely possible=C2=A0 and I could see the record getting a lot
faster than this. Especially if you could eliminate the long
pause while looking for pieces, that seems to be the thing
that's slowing the solve down the most is looking for pieces.

I also didn't use any
Macros, but that's because my method is mostly intuitive.<=
/p>

I'd be really curious to know if anyone else has been
speedsolving and what your time's are, or what methods you use.

Move splits

2x2x2x2 55/55

2x2x2x3 41/96

2x2x3x3 56/153

F2L=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0127/280

OLC=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0110/390

PLC=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0169/559=C2=A0

=20=20=20=20=20=20