--0000000000001f6b450575e06319
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I think that's the best we can do, since there's no solution below 7 moves
for that case on the Speedsolving wiki
- Andy
On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 8:13 PM lucas.denhof.58@gmail.com [4D_Cubing] <
4D_Cubing@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
>
>
> Hey everyone, I am the 9th solver of the physical 2x2x2x2 and have
> recently joined this group. I wanted to show you an algorithm I found tha=
t
> basically flips only one side of the cube 180=CB=9A.
>
> You can see the algorithm here: https://youtu.be/ru_OgVwlfKE
>
> I researched and have just found a quicker way of solving the 3d cube par=
t
> of it by using a simple 2x2x2 solver.
>
> Instead of using this on both sides on both cubes: R' F R' B2 R F' R' B2
> R2 (36 moves long)
>
> I can now do this: R2 U F2 U2 R2 U R2 (28 moves long)
>
>
> Let me know if one of you finds a way to shorten it even more somehow.
>
> Thanks,
>
> ~Lucas
>=20
>
--=20
"Machines take me by surprise with great frequency." - Alan Turing
--0000000000001f6b450575e06319
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
order-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
=20
=20=20=20=20=20=20
=20=20=20=20=20=20
Hey everyone, I am the 9th solver of the physical=C2=A02x=
2x2x2 and have recently joined this group. I wanted to show you an algorith=
m I found that basically flips only one side of the cube 180=CB=9A.<=
/p>You can see the algorithm here:=C2=A0s://youtu.be/ru_OgVwlfKE" target=3D"_blank">https://youtu.be/ru_OgVwlfKE>
=ord-spacing:normal">
m, -apple-system, system-ui, Helvetica Neue, Lucida Grande">font-size:15px;white-space:pre-wrap">Let me know if one of you finds a way =
to shorten it even more somehow.Thanks,
~Lucasp>
=20=20=20=20=20
=20=20=20=20
=20=20