------=_NextPart_000_001C_01D36532.4E5F3970
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Take the 3D/2D analogon.
A flat L-shape is achiral in 3D but chiral in 2D.
You can chose 2 different projections from 3D to 2D to produce the two form=
s of the chiral L in 2D.
The flat 2D L-shape can be turned in 3D to become a mirrored example.
Same in 4D/3D
The achiral tesseract in 4D can be projected to 3D by two different project=
ions (operations) to produce a right handed or a left handed 3D projection =
(result).
The righthanded 3D projection (result) of 2^4 can be turned in 4D to the le=
fthanded 3D projection (result) of 2^4.
Handedness of 2^4 appears only after the 4D/3D projection and you have two =
possible projections.
MCD4 has chosen one specific projection. The physical 2^4 should chose the =
same projection for practical reasons.
Hmph.
Best regards
Ed
----- Original Message -----=20
From: Marc Ringuette ringuette@solarmirror.com [4D_Cubing]=20
To: 4D_Cubing@yahoogroups.com=20
Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2017 7:04 PM
Subject: [MC4D] Yes, there is handedness in 4D, 5D, etc
=20=20=20=20
(I'm re-sending this after 24 hours of not seeing it show up on the list)
Don't believe everything you read in a book.
I spent a long time yesterday trying to figure out how to reconcile the=20
claim that Ed quoted, that "handedness has no meaning in spaces with 4=20
dimensions or more", with the fact that I observe a handedness in MC4D=20
(we cannot create the left-right mirror image of the solved position via=
=20
any sequence of rotations; nor could I conceive of any non-stretching=20
rotations that MC4D could be lacking).
The resolution is simple: the quote is WRONG, completely wrong. There=20
is handedness in n-space for every n, called "orientation".
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orientation_(vector_space)
There are always two orientations, corresponding to a positive and=20
negative determinant of the unique linear transformation between a pair=20
of ordered bases. In every dimension n, if we put distinct colors on=20
all 2n sides of an n-dimensional hypercube, the object can never be=20
rotated into its mirror image.
Now I will try to expunge that wrong idea from my head.
Hmph.
Marc
=20=20
------=_NextPart_000_001C_01D36532.4E5F3970
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
=EF=BB=BF
(I'm re-sending this after 24 hours of not seeing it show up on the=20
list)
Don't believe everything you read in a book.
I spent =
a=20
long time yesterday trying to figure out how to reconcile the
claim t=
hat=20
Ed quoted, that "handedness has no meaning in spaces with 4
dimension=
s or=20
more", with the fact that I observe a handedness in MC4D
(we cannot c=
reate=20
the left-right mirror image of the solved position via
any sequence o=
f=20
rotations; nor could I conceive of any non-stretching
rotations that =
MC4D=20
could be lacking).
The resolution is simple: the quote is WR=
ONG,=20
completely wrong. There
is handedness in n-space for every n, c=
alled=20
"orientation".
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orientation_(vector_s=
pace)
There=20
are always two orientations, corresponding to a positive and
negative=
=20
determinant of the unique linear transformation between a pair
of ord=
ered=20
bases. In every dimension n, if we put distinct colors on
>all=20
2n sides of an n-dimensional hypercube, the object can never be
rotat=
ed=20
into its mirror image.
Now I will try to expunge that wrong idea f=
rom=20
my head.
Hmph.
Marc