Thread: "2x2x2x2 blindfold solve!"

From: damienturtle@hotmail.co.uk
Date: 01 Oct 2017 19:32:18 +0000
Subject: 2x2x2x2 blindfold solve!




From: damienturtle@hotmail.co.uk
Date: 01 Oct 2017 19:43:22 +0000
Subject: 2x2x2x2 blindfold solve!




From: mananself@gmail.com
Date: 01 Oct 2017 20:16:51 +0000
Subject: Re: 2x2x2x2 blindfold solve!




From: damienturtle@hotmail.co.uk
Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2017 21:44:49 -0700
Subject: Re: 2x2x2x2 blindfold solve!



--------------4437BBFCE6478132BFA2829B
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Congratulations, Matthew!

It's really wonderful to have a first blind no-macro 2^4, and it's especial=
ly nice to be able to see the complete video record. Yes of course there's =
not a lot of action in the middle but I really enjoyed watching it straight=
through since I think that captured a lot of the intensity of the attempt =
and of your ultimate success. It also makes a great record for this importa=
nt milestone. I also like that you felt the need to at least partially wear=
your physical blindfold!

I've created a page of thoughts for people interested in blind 4D solves he=
re:
=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 http://superliminal.com/cube/blind.html
Note that this overlaps a bit with Nan's wiki entry for blind solutions and=
his (short) list of solutions:
=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 http://wiki.superliminal.com/wiki/Main_Page#Blindfolded=
_Solving
I've not linked mine anywhere since they should probably be merged or somet=
hing, so help and suggestions are more than welcome.
Matthew: I encourage you to at least add your new record to Nan's table and=
link to your log file and video from there.

I loved looking back through the archives just now and seeing that it was e=
xpected that Matthew would do this "soon ps/4D_Cubing/conversations/messages/1864>" after Nan did the first blind so=
lve in 2011. I think it's great when people have goals that they keep comin=
g back to. Good luck on your first blind 3^4. I hope we see it before 2023!

-Melinda

On 10/1/2017 12:32 PM, damienturtle@hotmail.co.uk [4D_Cubing] wrote:
>
>
> Hey everyone!
>
>
> I'm continuing my trend of the last few years and playing around with hyp=
ercubes every once in a long while. Yesterday, I finally solved the 2^4 in =
blindfolded mode!
>
> Video: https://youtu.be/UbLPxuSDRk8
>
>
> I attempted this a few times several years ago, and I think the closest I=
got was off by 2 twisted corners. I didn't practise much beforehand, so I =
was surprised to get a success on the second attempt. It's not a great time=
, but I just wanted to go safe and get a success. The time was 23:16 [10:12=
], I worked that out from the video since I actually forgot to stop the tim=
er until after I stopped recording. The solve had 16 targets, and I had to =
fix the buffer at the end since of course it's possible to twist one corner=
in isolation in 4D. I've uploaded the log file to my folder here for anyon=
e interested in looking through the solve.
>
> < p>
>
> This isn't the first blind solve of the 2^4. Nan Ma did it first I think =
(please correct me if I forgot someone!), and I don't recall anyone else do=
ing it since. However, I think it is the first no-macro blind solve. I inte=
nd to do the 3^4 blind eventually, but not in the near future.
>
>
> This version of MC4D was made by Mathologer (https://www.youtube.com/watc=
h?v=3DyhPH1369OWc), it makes it easy to grey out the stickers during execut=
ion.
>
>
> Also, I'm learning Java gradually in my spare time, and I'm planning to m=
ake my own version of MC4D eventually with a few changes including keyboard=
controls, since clicking can be unreliable and slow as you can see in the =
video. It seems like a fun project to really get to grips with the language=
, though I'll do a couple of smaller things with it first rather than jumpi=
ng right into the deep end.
>
>
> I'd definitely like to see more people trying this out, it's a fun challe=
nge!
>
>
> Matt
>
>
>
>
>=20


--------------4437BBFCE6478132BFA2829B
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable



">


Congratulations, Matthew!



It's really wonderful to have a first blind no-macro 2^4, and it's
especially nice to be able to see the complete video record. Yes of
course there's not a lot of action in the middle but I really
enjoyed watching it straight through since I think that captured a
lot of the intensity of the attempt and of your ultimate success. It
also makes a great record for this important milestone. I also like
that you felt the need to at least partially wear your physical
blindfold!



I've created a page of thoughts for people interested in blind 4D
solves here:

=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 perliminal.com/cube/blind.html">http://superliminal.com/cube/blind.html=


Note that this overlaps a bit with Nan's wiki entry for blind
solutions and his (short) list of solutions:

=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 ki.superliminal.com/wiki/Main_Page#Blindfolded_Solving">http://wiki.superli=
minal.com/wiki/Main_Page#Blindfolded_Solving


I've not linked mine anywhere since they should probably be merged
or something, so help and suggestions are more than welcome.

Matthew: I encourage you to at least add your new record to Nan's
table and link to your log file and video from there.



I loved looking back through the archives just now and seeing that
it was expected that Matthew would do this " moz-do-not-send=3D"true"
href=3D"https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/4D_Cubing/conversations/message=
s/1864">soon"
after Nan did the first blind solve in 2011. I think it's great when
people have goals that they keep coming back to. Good luck on your
first blind 3^4. I hope we see it before 2023!



-Melinda



On 10/1/2017 12:32 PM,
mail.co.uk">damienturtle@hotmail.co.uk [4D_Cubing] wrote:





Hey everyone!





I'm continuing my trend of the last few years and playing
around with hypercubes every once in a long while. Yesterday, I
finally solved the 2^4 in blindfolded mode!


Video: href=3D"https://youtu.be/UbLPxuSDRk8" moz-do-not-send=3D"true">ht=
tps://youtu.be/UbLPxuSDRk8





I attempted this a few times several years ago, and I think the
closest I got was off by 2 twisted corners. I didn't practise
much beforehand, so I was surprised to get a success on the
second attempt. It's not a great time, but I just wanted to go
safe and get a success. The time was 23:16 [10:12], I worked
that out from the video since I actually forgot to stop the
timer until after I stopped recording. The solve had 16 targets,
and I had to fix the buffer at the end since of course it's
possible to twist one corner in isolation in 4D. I've uploaded
the log file to my folder here for anyone interested in looking
through the solve.


< p>

This isn't the first blind solve of the 2^4. Nan Ma did it
first I think (please correct me if I forgot someone!), and I
don't recall anyone else doing it since. However, I think it is
the first no-macro blind solve. I intend to do the 3^4 blind
eventually, but not in the near future.





This version of MC4D was made by Mathologer
(/watch?v=3DyhPH1369OWc">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3DyhPH1369OWc),=
it makes it easy
to grey out the stickers during execution.





Also, I'm learning Java gradually in my spare time, and I'm
planning to make my own version of MC4D eventually with a few
changes including keyboard controls, since clicking can be
unreliable and slow as you can see in the video. It seems like a
fun project to really get to grips with the language, though
I'll do a couple of smaller things with it first rather than
jumping right into the deep end.





I'd definitely like to see more people trying this out, it's a
fun challenge!






Matt





=20=20=20=20=20=20







--------------4437BBFCE6478132BFA2829B--




From: Ty Jones <whotyjones@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2017 07:08:58 +0000
Subject: Re: [MC4D] 2x2x2x2 blindfold solve!



--94eb2c0a333002e2cb055a8b0d8e
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Wow! Awesome job Matt! I'll definitely check out the video soon!

On Sun, Oct 1, 2017, 10:45 PM Melinda Green melinda@superliminal.com
[4D_Cubing] <4D_Cubing@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

>
>
> Congratulations, Matthew!
>
> It's really wonderful to have a first blind no-macro 2^4, and it's
> especially nice to be able to see the complete video record. Yes of cours=
e
> there's not a lot of action in the middle but I really enjoyed watching i=
t
> straight through since I think that captured a lot of the intensity of th=
e
> attempt and of your ultimate success. It also makes a great record for th=
is
> important milestone. I also like that you felt the need to at least
> partially wear your physical blindfold!
>
> I've created a page of thoughts for people interested in blind 4D solves
> here:
> http://superliminal.com/cube/blind.html
> Note that this overlaps a bit with Nan's wiki entry for blind solutions
> and his (short) list of solutions:
> http://wiki.superliminal.com/wiki/Main_Page#Blindfolded_Solving
> I've not linked mine anywhere since they should probably be merged or
> something, so help and suggestions are more than welcome.
> Matthew: I encourage you to at least add your new record to Nan's table
> and link to your log file and video from there.
>
> I loved looking back through the archives just now and seeing that it was
> expected that Matthew would do this "soon
> 4>"
> after Nan did the first blind solve in 2011. I think it's great when peop=
le
> have goals that they keep coming back to. Good luck on your first blind
> 3^4. I hope we see it before 2023!
>
> -Melinda
>
>
>
> On 10/1/2017 12:32 PM, damienturtle@hotmail.co.uk [4D_Cubing] wrote:
>
> Hey everyone!
>
>
> I'm continuing my trend of the last few years and playing around with
> hypercubes every once in a long while. Yesterday, I finally solved the 2^=
4
> in blindfolded mode!
>
> Video: https://youtu.be/UbLPxuSDRk8
>
>
> I attempted this a few times several years ago, and I think the closest I
> got was off by 2 twisted corners. I didn't practise much beforehand, so I
> was surprised to get a success on the second attempt. It's not a great
> time, but I just wanted to go safe and get a success. The time was 23:16
> [10:12], I worked that out from the video since I actually forgot to stop
> the timer until after I stopped recording. The solve had 16 targets, and =
I
> had to fix the buffer at the end since of course it's possible to twist o=
ne
> corner in isolation in 4D. I've uploaded the log file to my folder here f=
or
> anyone interested in looking through the solve.
>
> < p>
>
>
> This isn't the first blind solve of the 2^4. Nan Ma did it first I think
> (please correct me if I forgot someone!), and I don't recall anyone else
> doing it since. However, I think it is the first no-macro blind solve. I
> intend to do the 3^4 blind eventually, but not in the near future.
>
>
> This version of MC4D was made by Mathologer (
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3DyhPH1369OWc), it makes it easy to grey
> out the stickers during execution.
>
>
> Also, I'm learning Java gradually in my spare time, and I'm planning to
> make my own version of MC4D eventually with a few changes including
> keyboard controls, since clicking can be unreliable and slow as you can s=
ee
> in the video. It seems like a fun project to really get to grips with the
> language, though I'll do a couple of smaller things with it first rather
> than jumping right into the deep end.
>
>
> I'd definitely like to see more people trying this out, it's a fun
> challenge!
>
>
> Matt
>
>
>
>=20
>

--94eb2c0a333002e2cb055a8b0d8e
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Wow! Awesome job Matt! I'll definitely check out the vid=
eo soon!



On Sun, Oct 1, 2017, 10:45 =
PM Melinda Green melinda@superl=
iminal.com
[4D_Cubing] <>4D_Cubing@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
il_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-lef=
t:1ex">












=20

=C2=A0







=20=20=20=20=20=20
=20=20=20=20=20=20


=20=20
=20=20
Congratulations, Matthew!



It's really wonderful to have a first blind no-macro 2^4, and it=
9;s
especially nice to be able to see the complete video record. Yes of
course there's not a lot of action in the middle but I really
enjoyed watching it straight through since I think that captured a
lot of the intensity of the attempt and of your ultimate success. It
also makes a great record for this important milestone. I also like
that you felt the need to at least partially wear your physical
blindfold!



I've created a page of thoughts for people interested in blind 4D
solves here:

=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 xt" href=3D"http://superliminal.com/cube/blind.html" target=3D"_blank">http=
://superliminal.com/cube/blind.html


Note that this overlaps a bit with Nan's wiki entry for blind
solutions and his (short) list of solutions:

=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 xt" href=3D"http://wiki.superliminal.com/wiki/Main_Page#Blindfolded_Solving=
" target=3D"_blank">http://wiki.superliminal.com/wiki/Main_Page#Blindfolded=
_Solving


I've not linked mine anywhere since they should probably be merged
or something, so help and suggestions are more than welcome.

Matthew: I encourage you to at least add your new record to Nan's
table and link to your log file and video from there.



I loved looking back through the archives just now and seeing that
it was expected that Matthew would do this "ups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/4D_Cubing/conversations/messages/1864" target=3D"_=
blank">soon
"
after Nan did the first blind solve in 2011. I think it's great whe=
n
people have goals that they keep coming back to. Good luck on your
first blind 3^4. I hope we see it before 2023!



-Melinda

">
590ygrp-msg">
d=3D"m_6900506239252351590ygrp-mlmsg">
msg">

">
=20=20=20=20=20=20
=20=20=20=20=20=20

Hey everyone!





I'm continuing my trend of the last few years and playing
around with hypercubes every once in a long while. Yesterday, I
finally solved the 2^4 in blindfolded mode!


Video: arget=3D"_blank">https://youtu.be/UbLPxuSDRk8





I attempted this a few times several years ago, and I think the
closest I got was off by 2 twisted corners. I didn't practise
much beforehand, so I was surprised to get a success on the
second attempt. It's not a great time, but I just wanted to go
safe and get a success. The time was 23:16 [10:12], I worked
that out from the video since I actually forgot to stop the
timer until after I stopped recording. The solve had 16 targets,
and I had to fix the buffer at the end since of course it's
possible to twist one corner in isolation in 4D. I've uploaded
the log file to my folder here for anyone interested in looking
through the solve.

style=3D"background-color:#fff">
">
0ygrp-text">


< p>

ground-color:#fff">
_6900506239252351590ygrp-msg">
>


This isn't the first blind solve of the 2^4. Nan Ma did it
first I think (please correct me if I forgot someone!), and I
don't recall anyone else doing it since. However, I think it is
the first no-macro blind solve. I intend to do the 3^4 blind
eventually, but not in the near future.





This version of MC4D was made by Mathologer
(tps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3DyhPH1369OWc" target=3D"_blank">https://www.=
youtube.com/watch?v=3DyhPH1369OWc
), it makes it easy
to grey out the stickers during execution.





Also, I'm learning Java gradually in my spare time, and I'=
m
planning to make my own version of MC4D eventually with a few
changes including keyboard controls, since clicking can be
unreliable and slow as you can see in the video. It seems like a
fun project to really get to grips with the language, though
I'll do a couple of smaller things with it first rather than
jumping right into the deep end.





I'd definitely like to see more people trying this out, it'=
;s a
fun challenge!






Matt





=20=20=20=20=20=20

:#fff">
52351590ygrp-msg">

type=3D"cite">


=20=20




=20=20=20=20=20

=20=20=20=20







=20=20








--94eb2c0a333002e2cb055a8b0d8e--





Return to MagicCube4D main page
Return to the Superliminal home page