Thread: "3^4 methods and speed optimisation"

From: scarecrowfish@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2017 19:01:55 -0400
Subject: 3^4 methods and speed optimisation



--94eb2c08b3d2e0e8460551f389a2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

Hi Luna,

Good luck with the 3^6!

We had a speedsolving competition a long while back with people getting
under 20 minutes for 3^4 with macros. No idea how they did it though.

As for methods, there are definitely CFOP-type ones for the 3^4. One of
them is listed on the superliminal wiki, though it's a bit outdated. I've
also managed a sub-500 move solution with a Petrus-type method, but in both
cases the last layer took up a significant portion of the moves. I haven't
found a Roux-type method yet though...I imagine it's much more difficult
with the middle slice containing both 2c and 3c pieces.

Since you are also developing a CFOP-type method for the 3^4, I'm wondering
whether it translates well to the 3^5?

Thanks,

Ray

--94eb2c08b3d2e0e8460551f389a2
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Luna,

Good luck with t=
he 3^6!

We had a speedsolving competition a long while =
back with people getting under 20 minutes for 3^4 with macros. No idea how =
they did it though.

As for methods, there are definitely CFOP-type o=
nes for the 3^4. One of=20
them is listed on the superliminal wiki, though it's a bit=20
outdated.
I've also managed a sub-500 move solution with a Petrus-type method,=20
but in both cases the last layer took up a significant portion of the=20
moves. I haven't found a Roux-type method yet though...I imagine it'=
;s much more difficult with the middle slice containing both 2c and 3c piec=
es.

Since you are also developing a CFOP-type method for the 3^4, I&=
#39;m wondering whether it translates well to the
3^5?

Thanks,

Ray


>


--94eb2c08b3d2e0e8460551f389a2--




From: scarecrowfish@gmail.com
Date: 15 Jun 2017 14:06:04 +0000
Subject: Re: 3^4 methods and speed optimisation




From: scarecrowfish@gmail.com
Date: 15 Jun 2017 17:08:13 +0000
Subject: Re: 3^4 methods and speed optimisation




From: scarecrowfish@gmail.com
Date: 18 Jun 2017 11:38:27 +0000
Subject: Re: 3^4 methods and speed optimisation





Return to MagicCube4D main page
Return to the Superliminal home page