--------------080501050406060301060903
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
I was wondering about just that. Would it help the efficiency of an
automated solution to begin with a phase where it looks at all possible
twists and always performs the one with the greatest overall effect of
moving pieces closer to their destinations? Seems like it should be a
good idea for large puzzles but not for human solvers.
On 11/27/2015 1:28 PM, llamaonacid@gmail.com [4D_Cubing] wrote:
>
>
> Also, at first I did not want to change the rotation rate. It took
> some time to get used to a faster rotation rate. I still want some
> animation though. Another tip would be to bring all the 3c or 4c
> pieces of a 2D face close to where they suppose to be then do the
> algorithms instead of finding one then doing algorithm/s then finding
> another piece and so on.
--------------080501050406060301060903
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Also, at first I did not want to change the rotation rate. It took
some time to get used to a faster rotation rate. I still want some
animation though. Another tip would be to bring all the 3c or 4c
pieces of a 2D face close to where they suppose to be then do the
algorithms instead of finding one then doing algorithm/s then
finding another piece and so on.