------=_NextPart_000_0039_01D0630B.1FD642F0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_NextPart_001_003A_01D0630B.1FD642F0"
------=_NextPart_001_003A_01D0630B.1FD642F0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Idea for a special puzzle.
"Scramble the stickers of a normal 3x3 Rubiks cube".
Then scramble the sticker-scrambled Rubiks and ask for solving
a) without seeing the solved state
b) with seeing the solved state
There can be pretty sticker-scramblings like the one in the picture.
This on has 6 uni-color vertices, 2 tri-color vertices, 6 uni-color edges a=
nd 6 bicolored edges.
When you scramble the stickers at random you can ask for pretty patterns.
Kind regards
Ed
------=_NextPart_001_003A_01D0630B.1FD642F0
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
------=_NextPart_000_0016_01D063C1.1EA9B220
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
With one correction and a complement:
"Scramble the stickers of a normal 3x3 Rubiks cube".
Then scramble the sticker-scrambled Rubiks and ask for solving
a) without seeing the solved state
b) with seeing the solved state
There can be pretty sticker-scramblings like the one in the picture.
This one has 6 uni-color vertices, 2 tri-color vertices, 6 uni-color edges =
and 6 bicolored edges.
When you have scrambled the stickers at random you can ask for pretty patte=
rns by twisting.
Kind regards
Ed
----- Original Message -----=20
From: 'Deadhead_DMT' Deadhead_DMT@hotmail.com [4D_Cubing]=20
To: 4D_Cubing@yahoogroups.com=20
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2015 11:31 PM
Subject: Re: [MC4D] Scramble the stickers of a normal 3x3 Rubiks cube
=20=20=20=20
Melinda...
=E2=80=9CIt reminds me of a puzzle in a newspaper I once solved. It looke=
d like a normal jigsaw puzzle that I had to cut out to solve, but once solv=
ed, it turned out to be a picture of a jigsaw puzzle. So I taped all the pi=
eces together and then cut out the pieces of the new puzzle and solved *tha=
t* one which turned out to be a picture of an electric jigsaw.=20
=E2=80=9C
Thank you for a wonderful idea to make as family gifts... I loved this =
idea!!!=20=20
TEACH PEACE!!! :D
David Michael Turner
Deadhead_DMT@hotmail.com
From: Melinda Green melinda@superliminal.com [4D_Cubing]=20
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2015 6:08 PM
To: 4D_Cubing@yahoogroups.com=20
Subject: Re: [MC4D] Scramble the stickers of a normal 3x3 Rubiks cube
=20=20=20=20
I see. It's sort of a combination of a jigsaw puzzle and a twisty puzzle.=
I guess you could test it on people by peeling and rearranging the sticker=
s into nice patterns.
It reminds me of a puzzle in a newspaper I once solved. It looked like a =
normal jigsaw puzzle that I had to cut out to solve, but once solved, it tu=
rned out to be a picture of a jigsaw puzzle. So I taped all the pieces toge=
ther and then cut out the pieces of the new puzzle and solved *that* one wh=
ich turned out to be a picture of an electric jigsaw.
-Melinda
P.S. David Vanderschel helped me figure out the problem of display of ret=
urn addresses which turned out to be a settings change in my email client (=
Thunderbird) that I think came with an update. (Thanks David!) I found a v=
iew setting so I can now at least see the sender's name. So the problem was=
on my end, not Yahoo's, and you don't need to sign your messages if you do=
n't want to. That seems like the new standard for informal email, and I'm s=
tarting to use it.
On 3/20/2015 4:41 AM, 'Eduard Baumann' ed.baumann@bluewin.ch [4D_Cubing] =
wrote:
Idea for a special puzzle.
"Scramble the stickers of a normal 3x3 Rubiks cube".
Then scramble the sticker-scrambled Rubiks and ask for solving
a) without seeing the solved state
b) with seeing the solved state
There can be pretty sticker-scramblings like the one in the picture.
This on has 6 uni-color vertices, 2 tri-color vertices, 6 uni-color edg=
es and 6 bicolored edges.
When you scramble the stickers at random you can ask for pretty pattern=
s.
Kind regards
Ed
=20=20
------=_NextPart_000_0016_01D063C1.1EA9B220
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
=EF=BB=BF
I see. It's sort of a combination of a jigsaw puzzle and a twisty puzz=
le. I=20
guess you could test it on people by peeling and rearranging the stickers=
into=20
nice patterns.
It reminds me of a puzzle in a newspaper I once sol=
ved.=20
It looked like a normal jigsaw puzzle that I had to cut out to solve, but=
once=20
solved, it turned out to be a picture of a jigsaw puzzle. So I taped all =
the=20
pieces together and then cut out the pieces of the new puzzle and solved=
=20
*that* one which turned out to be a picture of an electric=20
jigsaw.
-Melinda
P.S. David Vanderschel helped me figure ou=
t the=20
problem of display of return addresses which turned out to be a settings=
=20
change in my email client (Thunderbird) that I think came with an update.=
=20
(Thanks David!) I found a view setting so I can now at least see th=
e=20
sender's name. So the problem was on my end, not Yahoo's, and you don't n=
eed=20
to sign your messages if you don't want to. That seems like the new stand=
ard=20
for informal email, and I'm starting to use it.
cite">
Idea for a special puzzle.
"Scramble the stickers of a normal 3x3 Rubiks cube".
Then scramble the sticker-scrambled Rubiks and ask for solvingV>-- end group email -->
a) without seeing the solved state
b) with seeing the solved state
There can be pretty sticker-scramblings like the one in the=20
picture.
This on has 6 uni-color vertices, 2 tri-color vertices, 6 uni-colo=
r=20
edges and 6 bicolored edges.
When you scramble the stickers at random you can ask for pretty=20
patterns.
Kind regards
Ed
------=_NextPart_000_001D_01D063C7.7177E930
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_NextPart_001_001E_01D063C7.7177E930"
------=_NextPart_001_001E_01D063C7.7177E930
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Do you know BrainBreaker?
Here is a picture of a recursive jigsaw.
Best regards
Ed
----- Original Message -----=20
From: Melinda Green melinda@superliminal.com [4D_Cubing]=20
To: 4D_Cubing@yahoogroups.com=20
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2015 11:08 PM
Subject: Re: [MC4D] Scramble the stickers of a normal 3x3 Rubiks cube
=20=20=20=20
I see. It's sort of a combination of a jigsaw puzzle and a twisty puzzle.=
I guess you could test it on people by peeling and rearranging the sticker=
s into nice patterns.
It reminds me of a puzzle in a newspaper I once solved. It looked like a =
normal jigsaw puzzle that I had to cut out to solve, but once solved, it tu=
rned out to be a picture of a jigsaw puzzle. So I taped all the pieces toge=
ther and then cut out the pieces of the new puzzle and solved *that* one wh=
ich turned out to be a picture of an electric jigsaw.
-Melinda
P.S. David Vanderschel helped me figure out the problem of display of ret=
urn addresses which turned out to be a settings change in my email client (=
Thunderbird) that I think came with an update. (Thanks David!) I found a v=
iew setting so I can now at least see the sender's name. So the problem was=
on my end, not Yahoo's, and you don't need to sign your messages if you do=
n't want to. That seems like the new standard for informal email, and I'm s=
tarting to use it.
On 3/20/2015 4:41 AM, 'Eduard Baumann' ed.baumann@bluewin.ch [4D_Cubing] =
wrote:
Idea for a special puzzle.
"Scramble the stickers of a normal 3x3 Rubiks cube".
Then scramble the sticker-scrambled Rubiks and ask for solving
a) without seeing the solved state
b) with seeing the solved state
There can be pretty sticker-scramblings like the one in the picture.
This on has 6 uni-color vertices, 2 tri-color vertices, 6 uni-color edg=
es and 6 bicolored edges.
When you scramble the stickers at random you can ask for pretty pattern=
s.
Kind regards
Ed
=20=20
------=_NextPart_001_001E_01D063C7.7177E930
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I see. It's sort of a combination of a jigsaw puzzle and a twisty puzz=
le. I=20
guess you could test it on people by peeling and rearranging the stickers=
into=20
nice patterns.
It reminds me of a puzzle in a newspaper I once sol=
ved.=20
It looked like a normal jigsaw puzzle that I had to cut out to solve, but=
once=20
solved, it turned out to be a picture of a jigsaw puzzle. So I taped all =
the=20
pieces together and then cut out the pieces of the new puzzle and solved=
=20
*that* one which turned out to be a picture of an electric=20
jigsaw.
-Melinda
P.S. David Vanderschel helped me figure ou=
t the=20
problem of display of return addresses which turned out to be a settings=
=20
change in my email client (Thunderbird) that I think came with an update.=
=20
(Thanks David!) I found a view setting so I can now at least see th=
e=20
sender's name. So the problem was on my end, not Yahoo's, and you don't n=
eed=20
to sign your messages if you don't want to. That seems like the new stand=
ard=20
for informal email, and I'm starting to use it.
cite">
Idea for a special puzzle.>
"Scramble the stickers of a normal 3x3=
Rubiks=20
cube".
Then scramble the sticker-scrambled Ru=
biks and=20
ask for solving
a) without seeing the solved stateNT>
b) with seeing the solved state=
There can be pretty sticker-scrambling=
s like=20
the one in the picture.
This on has 6 uni-color vertices, 2 tr=
i-color=20
vertices, 6 uni-color edges and 6 bicolored edges.
When you scramble the stickers at rand=
om you=20
can ask for pretty patterns.
Kind regards
Ed
--------------090609020508000700030303
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Neat, but I guess you can't completely solve it on the screen. I'd not=20
seen it before but I'm more of a puzzle maker than a puzzle solver.
-Melinda
On 3/21/2015 3:09 AM, 'Eduard Baumann' ed.baumann@bluewin.ch [4D_Cubing]=20
wrote:
>
>
> Do you know BrainBreaker?
> Here is a picture of a recursive jigsaw.
>
> Best regards
> Ed
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> *From:* Melinda Green melinda@superliminal.com [4D_Cubing]
>
> *To:* 4D_Cubing@yahoogroups.com
> *Sent:* Friday, March 20, 2015 11:08 PM
> *Subject:* Re: [MC4D] Scramble the stickers of a normal 3x3 Rubiks
> cube
>
> I see. It's sort of a combination of a jigsaw puzzle and a twisty
> puzzle. I guess you could test it on people by peeling and
> rearranging the stickers into nice patterns.
>
> It reminds me of a puzzle in a newspaper I once solved. It looked
> like a normal jigsaw puzzle that I had to cut out to solve, but
> once solved, it turned out to be a picture of a jigsaw puzzle. So
> I taped all the pieces together and then cut out the pieces of the
> new puzzle and solved *that* one which turned out to be a picture
> of an electric jigsaw.
>
> -Melinda
>
> P.S. David Vanderschel helped me figure out the problem of display
> of return addresses which turned out to be a settings change in my
> email client (Thunderbird) that I think came with an update.
> (Thanks David!) I found a view setting so I can now at least see
> the sender's name. So the problem was on my end, not Yahoo's, and
> you don't need to sign your messages if you don't want to. That
> seems like the new standard for informal email, and I'm starting
> to use it.
>
> On 3/20/2015 4:41 AM, 'Eduard Baumann' ed.baumann@bluewin.ch
> [4D_Cubing] wrote:
>> Idea for a special puzzle.
>> "Scramble the stickers of a normal 3x3 Rubiks cube".
>> Then scramble the sticker-scrambled Rubiks and ask for solving
>> a) without seeing the solved state
>> b) with seeing the solved state
>> There can be pretty sticker-scramblings like the one in the picture.
>> This on has 6 uni-color vertices, 2 tri-color vertices, 6
>> uni-color edges and 6 bicolored edges.
>> When you scramble the stickers at random you can ask for pretty
>> patterns.
>> Kind regards
>> Ed
>
>
>
>=20=20=20=20=20
>
--------------090609020508000700030303
Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
http-equiv=3D"Content-Type">
Neat, but I guess you can't completely solve it on the screen. I'd
not seen it before but I'm more of a puzzle maker than a puzzle
solver.
-Melinda
type=3D"cite">
http-equiv=3D"Content-Type">
=20=20=20=20=20=20
jigsaw.
5px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
black">From: title=3D"4D_Cubing@yahoogroups.com"
href=3D"mailto:melinda@superliminal.com%20[4D_Cubing]">Melinda
Green melinda@superliminal.com [4D_Cubing]
I see. It's sort of a combination of a jigsaw puzzle and a
twisty puzzle. I guess you could test it on people by
peeling and rearranging the stickers into nice patterns.
It reminds me of a puzzle in a newspaper I once solved. It
looked like a normal jigsaw puzzle that I had to cut out to
solve, but once solved, it turned out to be a picture of a
jigsaw puzzle. So I taped all the pieces together and then
cut out the pieces of the new puzzle and solved *that* one
which turned out to be a picture of an electric jigsaw.
-Melinda
P.S. David Vanderschel helped me figure out the problem of
display of return addresses which turned out to be a
settings change in my email client (Thunderbird) that I
think came with an update. (Thanks David!)=A0 I found a view
setting so I can now at least see the sender's name. So the
problem was on my end, not Yahoo's, and you don't need to
sign your messages if you don't want to. That seems like the
new standard for informal email, and I'm starting to use it.
>