Thread: "6x6x6x6"

------=_NextPart_000_0020_01C59F1F.81D1CCA0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-2"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hello to all!

Recently I asked Melinda about the cube 6x6x6x6...

I know that I can solve it (not in two weeks but in month spending a little=
time everyday....)

I don't worry about my eyes because I can make picture as big as I want (le=
t's say the top face can by big as the whole screen). (I must finish my pag=
e with hypercubes and show my tricks ;))...

Complexity is big bacause of the number of stickers (1728).

The question is: "Is it worth to make that program for basicly two-three pe=
ople (who manadged with 5^4)? Medlinda said that 5^4 cube was the last with=
new elements and as you solve this there's no others challenges in 4D cube=
s. Yeaah , we know structure, algorithms on 4^4 and 5^4 that will work on 6=
^4 and give us solve but the chalenge is about complexity. As you know in p=
roduction there are cubes from 2x2x2 to 5x5x5. But people want bigger cubes=
(it is human nature to challegnge with more and more complex problems;). S=
o in this year there should be cubes 6x6x6 (http://www.olympicube.com/Pic4.=
jpg , http://www.olympicube.com/Pic1.jpg). There are some technicly problem=
s in making cubes with big number of pieces on the edge but one company wan=
t to sale cubes to size 11x11x11). Here in 4D in program there are no diffi=
culties to make higher cubes...

I would like to see cube 6x6x6x6. And solve it. But it will be long solving=
...(let's say I leave it to lonely cold evenings :) ).

Why man landed on the Moon? Becuse: "We can"
Why to solve 6^4? Because : "We can"




Oh, and one thing: I would more happy to see 5D cube :)))))))))))

I must read what was written about 5D cubes on 4Dgroup...And I will try to =
write about my thoughts about it.=20


Now bye,
Remigiusz Durka

------=_NextPart_000_0020_01C59F1F.81D1CCA0
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-2"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable



>