Thread: "MC4D: CFOP method test [1 Attachment]"

--1078491548-457250111-1338572834=:27547
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Dunno. =C2=A0Still kinda don't get how to link the 4D cube back to the 3D c=
ube, and I can't visualise how the F2L pieces move around on a 4D cube. =C2=
=A0I basically only used Fridrich, but for the last layer, I suggest using =
commutators (Beyer-Hardwick method could be helpful). =C2=A0btw, my times f=
or 3^3 cube have dropped down a few seconds, and I got a new pb on hi-games=
.net=C2=A0hi-games.net/cube-3x3x3/watch?u=3D3139.

Good luck with the last layer,
Brandon


________________________________
From: Ray Zhao
To: 4D_Cubing@yahoogroups.com=20
Sent: Friday, June 1, 2012 10:29 AM
Subject: [MC4D] MC4D: CFOP method test [1 Attachment]
=20

=C2=A0=20
[Attachment(s) from Ray Zhao included below]
Results for CFOP/Friedrich method:
Complete first two layers (2/3 of 3^4) in 377 moves, not bad.
BUT
last layer #moves=3Df2l #moves (total around 650 moves), therefore the last=
layer method still needs work.

Also, no shortcuts (e.g. recorded macros, edge turns, vertex turns) were us=
ed.
The edge/corner "parity" problems are inefficient with face-only turns, so =
I left them until last, which isn't a good idea.
Identifying the pieces often took a while and positioning 3c/4c pairs too.

Well, I don't know any other methods like roux or petrus so you can try sol=
ving the 3^4 using those methods.
--=20

while(true)
Console.Writeline("HI!")
=C2=A0

=20
--1078491548-457250111-1338572834=:27547
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable