http://www.wimp.com/robotsolves/
I suppose it could be faked but it looks OK to me.
-Melinda
My solvings 91 to 100
91 Solving of MT ell sph cube F 0:1:0 V 1:0:0 ----- 05/30/2012 (72 twists=
)
92 Solving of MT ell sph dodeca F 0:1:0 V 1:0:0 ----- 05/30/2012 (269 twi=
sts)
93 Solving of MT eucl torus {4,4} 9 E 0:1:0 ----- 05/30/2012 (81 twists)
94 Solving of MT eucl torus {4,4} 16 E 0:1:0 ----- 05/30/2012 (155 twists=
)
95 Solving of MT eucl torus {6,3} 7 E 1:0:0 ----- 05/30/2012 (169 twists)
96 Solving of MT eucl torus {6,3} 16 E 1:0:0 ----- 05/30/2012 (217 twists=
)
97 Solving of MT eucl klein {6,3} 9 E 1:0:0 ----- 05/31/2012 (169 twists)
98 Solving of MT hyp G4GX {4,10} CB E 0.5:0:0 ----- 05/31/2012 (7 twists)
99 Solving of MT hyp G4GX {4,10} 5 no E 0.5:0:0 ----- 05/31/2012 (81 twis=
ts)
100 Solving of MT hyp G4GX {10,4} CB E 1:0:0 ----- 05/31/2012 (19 twists)
I have added the chapter G4GX.
--047d7b33d650bf3eaf04c15f18d6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
It seems legit, cuz there are so many motors...I bet the machine cost
hundreds or something. Maybe it was the same position, like off-camera the
machine scans it?
--
while(true)
Console.Writeline("HI!")
--047d7b33d650bf3eaf04c15f18d6
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
It seems legit, cuz there are so many motors...I bet the machine cost hundr=
eds or something. Maybe it was the same position, like off-camera the machi=
ne scans it?
--
--1078491548-658591506-1338520383=:70716
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
It's=C2=A0CubeStormer II (http://www.speedsolving.com/wiki/index.php/List_o=
f_cube_solving_robots#CubeStormer_II). =C2=A0It uses a 2-phase method for s=
olving cubes move optimally (not Fridrich) as used prominently by Cube Expl=
orer 5.00 (http://kociemba.org/cube.htm). =C2=A0It orients all the pieces, =
and then permutates all the pieces using only half turns on the left, front=
, right, and back faces, and quarter or half turns on the top and bottom fa=
ces. =C2=A0This makes it easy for the robot's four arms' graplers to be abo=
ut to turn the cube quickly without letting go of the cube. =C2=A0I had mad=
e a human thistlethwaite algorithm for solving the cube in under 40 moves (=
HTM) and had worked on (and given up on) making a human 3-phase method for =
fewest moves that involves orienting the edges intuitively, orienting the f=
ront and back layer corners or top and bottom layer corners or left and rig=
ht layer corners optimally, and then permutating all pieces optimally for a=
n average 25
moves HTM (half turn metric). =C2=A0I also have a LEGO=C2=A0Mindstorms=C2=
=A0NXT robotics kit (bought for about $400) which is used for the robot, bu=
t I only have one and CubeStormer II uses two NXT computers with six indivi=
dual servo motors while I only have three individual servo motors. =C2=A0Al=
though I don't have a camera, the additional NXT computer, and three additi=
onal servo motors, I managed to make a robot that solves the cube in less t=
hat 3 minutes on average with a light sensor (not colour sensor) that obser=
ves the shades of the stickers. =C2=A0For a simple cube solving robot that =
uses the LEGO Mindstorms NXT robotics kit , go to=C2=A0http://tiltedtwister=
.com/tiltedtwister2.html =C2=A0There are also other robots that solve bigge=
r cubes and puzzles such as the megaminx and can be found at http://www.spe=
edsolving.com/wiki/index.php/List_of_cube_solving_robots.
Hope this helps,
Brandon.
________________________________
From: Ray Zhao
To: 4D_Cubing@yahoogroups.com=20
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2012 7:28 PM
Subject: [MC4D] Re: Lego robot solves Rubik's Cube in 5 seconds?
=20
=C2=A0=20
It seems legit, cuz there are so many motors...I bet the machine cost hundr=
eds or something. Maybe it was the same position, like off-camera the machi=
ne scans it?
--=20
while(true)
Console.Writeline("HI!")
=C2=A0
=20
--1078491548-658591506-1338520383=:70716
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
serif; ">
://www.speedsolving.com/wiki/index.php/List_of_cube_solving_robots#CubeStor=
mer_II). It uses a 2-phase method for solving cubes move optimally (n=
ot Fridrich) as used prominently by Cube Explorer 5.00 (http://kociemba.org=
/cube.htm). It orients all the pieces, and then permutates all the pi=
eces using only half turns on the left, front, right, and back faces, and q=
uarter or half turns on the top and bottom faces. This makes it easy =
for the robot's four arms' graplers to be about to turn the cube quickly
without letting go of the cube. I had made a human thistlethwaite al=
gorithm for solving the cube in under 40 moves (HTM) and had worked on (and=
given up on) making a human 3-phase method for fewest moves that involves =
orienting the edges intuitively, orienting the front and back layer corners=
or top and bottom layer corners or left and right layer corners optimally,=
and then permutating all pieces optimally for an average 25 moves HTM (hal=
f turn metric). I also have a LEGO ze: 12pt; ">Mindstorms >NXT robotics kit (bought for about $400)=
which is used for the robot, but I only have one and CubeStormer II uses t=
wo NXT computers with six individual servo motors while I only have three i=
ndividual servo motors. Although I don't have a camera, the additiona=
l NXT computer, and three additional servo motors, I managed to make a
robot that solves the cube in less that 3 minutes on average with a light =
sensor (not colour sensor) that observes the shades of the stickers. =
For a simple cube solving robot that uses the LEGO Mindstorms NXT robotics =
kit , go to http://tiltedtwister.com/tiltedtwister2.html There a=
re also other robots that solve bigger cubes and puzzles such as the megami=
nx and can be found at http://www.speedsolving.com/wiki/index.php/List_of_c=
ube_solving_robots.
Hope this helps,
id=3D"yiv1260798574yui_3_2_0_20_133851610148256" class=3D"yiv1260798574yui=
_3_2_0_20_133851610148254"> mes new roman', 'new york', times, serif; " class=3D"yiv1260798574yui_3_2_0=
_20_133851610148261">
ao <thermostatico@gmail.com>
>To: 4D_Cubing@yahoogroups.com
t:bold;">Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2012 7:28 PM
=3D"font-weight:bold;">Subject:
[MC4D] Re: Lego robot solves Rubik's Cube in 5 seconds?
=20=20=20=20=20=20
=20=20=20=20=20=20
cost hundreds or something. Maybe it was the same position, like off-camer=
a the machine scans it?
--
/div>
=20=20=20=20=20
--1078491548-658591506-1338520383=:70716--