Thread: "Dream?"

From: "Eduard" <baumann@mcnet.ch>
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 14:09:01 -0000
Subject: Dream?



--3-4680658113-8556269207=:1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


The 120-Cell has unmoved centers only in Magic120Cell and not in MC4D
(Hypermagaminx).

What is easier complete Magic120Cell with macros or complete MC4D with
"Finding help" and "show (highlight) only faces.."?
Eventually complete only Hypermagaminx in MCD4 (and not the others). It
is possible that combined "macro" and "Finding helps"
for the 120-Cell plus the evaluator was (is) a dream only.

In the mean time I couldn't resist to start in Magic120Cell. I'm
proud to have succeded with 8 of the 720 face cubies (contiguous). See
picture
art.jpg> (only faces highlighted) and log file
p87nyoDiFyXgkwN_18zuVa7GKr4rKflPpwHvFzE3YdXPXj3OAhcOWSaZN1gJA/baumann_12\
0c_start.log> . It is a good exercice to get a real feeling of this
world of 120 individuals. I recommend this exercice to everybody.




--3-4680658113-8556269207=:1
Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

The=
120-Cell has unmoved centers only in Magic120Cell and not in MC4D (Hyperma=
gaminx).


face=3D"Times New Roman">What is easier complete Magic120Cell with macros o=
r complete MC4D with "Finding help" and "show (highlight) only faces.."? FONT>
s New Roman">Eventually complete only Hypermagaminx in MCD4 (and not the ot=
hers).
e=3D"Times New Roman">It is possible that combined "macro" and "Finding hel=
ps" for the 120-Cell plus the evaluator was (is) a dream only.
>


LY: 'Times New Roman';FONT-SIZE: 12pt;" lang=3D"EN-GB">In the mean time I c=
ouldn't resist to start in Magic120Cell. I'm proud to have succeded with 8 =
of the 720 face cubies (contiguous). See roups/10714925/tn/509089081/name/baumann_120c_start.jpg">ace=3D"Georgia">picture <=
/FONT> (only faces highlighted) and /YMFjTQloCdmaw1H5lM-ldCWdLk9xxekzb0RH9PJWF7p87nyoDiFyXgkwN_18zuVa7GKr4rKflP=
pwHvFzE3YdXPXj3OAhcOWSaZN1gJA/baumann_120c_start.log">log file
 . I=
t is a good exercice to get a real feeling of this world of 120 individuals=
. I recommend this exercice to everybody.


 



--3-4680658113-8556269207=:1--




From: "Matthew" <damienturtle@hotmail.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 14:17:41 -0000
Subject: Re: Dream?



Thought I would chip in to this discussion, since I have solved a small por=
tion of this puzzle a few months ago (and I may actually try and finish it =
sometime). The preference on which feature is best really depends on how y=
ou solve it. Personally, I doubt I'll use any macros during the solve, I'l=
l just use blockbuilding for most of it then reduce it to a megaminx for th=
e last face, which shouldn't really require any macros. However, I reckon =
solving without piece finding is just insanity, there are just far too many=
pieces to find them manually. I'm curious about whether anyone else who h=
as solved part (or all) of the puzzle in is the same situation, or at least=
a similar one. Good luck with the solve Eduard :).

Matt

--- In 4D_Cubing@yahoogroups.com, "Eduard" wrote:
>
>=20
> The 120-Cell has unmoved centers only in Magic120Cell and not in MC4D
> (Hypermagaminx).
>=20
> What is easier complete Magic120Cell with macros or complete MC4D with
> "Finding help" and "show (highlight) only faces.."?
> Eventually complete only Hypermagaminx in MCD4 (and not the others). It
> is possible that combined "macro" and "Finding helps"
> for the 120-Cell plus the evaluator was (is) a dream only.
>=20
> In the mean time I couldn't resist to start in Magic120Cell. I'm
> proud to have succeded with 8 of the 720 face cubies (contiguous). See
> picture
> > art.jpg> (only faces highlighted) and log file
> > p87nyoDiFyXgkwN_18zuVa7GKr4rKflPpwHvFzE3YdXPXj3OAhcOWSaZN1gJA/baumann_12\
> 0c_start.log> . It is a good exercice to get a real feeling of this
> world of 120 individuals. I recommend this exercice to everybody.
>




From: "Eduard" <baumann@mcnet.ch>
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 14:18:31 -0000
Subject: Re: Dream?



--2-6888754651-6515364092=:3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable



A better link for picture
art.jpg>

--- In 4D_Cubing@yahoogroups.com, "Eduard" wrote:
>
>
> The 120-Cell has unmoved centers only in Magic120Cell and not in MC4D
> (Hypermagaminx).
>
> What is easier complete Magic120Cell with macros or complete MC4D with
> "Finding help" and "show (highlight) only faces.."?
> Eventually complete only Hypermagaminx in MCD4 (and not the others).
It
> is possible that combined "macro" and "Finding helps"
> for the 120-Cell plus the evaluator was (is) a dream only.
>
> In the mean time I couldn't resist to start in Magic120Cell. I'm
> proud to have succeded with 8 of the 720 face cubies (contiguous). See
> picture
>
\
> art.jpg> (only faces highlighted) and log file
>
\
>
p87nyoDiFyXgkwN_18zuVa7GKr4rKflPpwHvFzE3YdXPXj3OAhcOWSaZN1gJA/baumann_12\
\
> 0c_start.log> . It is a good exercice to get a real feeling of this
> world of 120 individuals. I recommend this exercice to everybody.
>



--2-6888754651-6515364092=:3
Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


aumann_120c_start.jpg">A better link for picture 


--- In 4D_Cubing@yahoogroups.com, "Eduard" <baumann@...> wrote:>>
>
> The 120-Cell has unmoved centers only in Magic120Cel=
l and not in MC4D
> (Hypermagaminx).
>
> What is easier =
complete Magic120Cell with macros or complete MC4D with
> "Finding he=
lp" and "show (highlight) only faces.."?
> Eventually complete only H=
ypermagaminx in MCD4 (and not the others). It
> is possible that comb=
ined "macro" and "Finding helps"
> for the 120-Cell plus the evaluato=
r was (is) a dream only.
>
> In the mean time I couldn't resis=
t to start in Magic120Cell. I'm
> proud to have succeded with 8 of th=
e 720 face cubies (contiguous). See
> picture
> <http://xa.y=
img.com/kq/groups/10714925/tn/509089081/name/baumann_120c_st\
> art.j=
pg> (only faces highlighted) and log file
> <http://f1.grp.yaho=
ofs.com/v1/YMFjTQloCdmaw1H5lM-ldCWdLk9xxekzb0RH9PJWF7\
> p87nyoDiFyXg=
kwN_18zuVa7GKr4rKflPpwHvFzE3YdXPXj3OAhcOWSaZN1gJA/baumann_12\
> 0c_st=
art.log> . It is a good exercice to get a real feeling of this
> w=
orld of 120 individuals. I recommend this exercice to everybody.
>>



--2-6888754651-6515364092=:3--




From: "Andrey" <andreyastrelin@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 16:48:10 -0000
Subject: Re: Dream?



My progress is about 10%=20

http://img-fotki.yandex.ru/get/4808/astr73.4a/0_726ff_e974bdd4_XXXL.jpg

4 cells and a middle layer around them are solved.

Andrey

--- In 4D_Cubing@yahoogroups.com, "Matthew" wrote:
>
> Thought I would chip in to this discussion, since I have solved a small p=
ortion of this puzzle a few months ago (and I may actually try and finish i=
t sometime). The preference on which feature is best really depends on how=
you solve it. Personally, I doubt I'll use any macros during the solve, I=
'll just use blockbuilding for most of it then reduce it to a megaminx for =
the last face, which shouldn't really require any macros. However, I recko=
n solving without piece finding is just insanity, there are just far too ma=
ny pieces to find them manually. I'm curious about whether anyone else who=
has solved part (or all) of the puzzle in is the same situation, or at lea=
st a similar one. Good luck with the solve Eduard :).
>=20
> Matt
>=20




From: "Eduard Baumann" <baumann@mcnet.ch>
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 17:56:22 +0100
Subject: Re: [MC4D] Re: Dream?



------=_NextPart_000_0011_01CBD2B9.D0DEDBC0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Wow, clearly more than my 3.17 o/oo ;-)
Ed

----- Original Message -----=20
From: Andrey=20
To: 4D_Cubing@yahoogroups.com=20
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2011 5:48 PM
Subject: [MC4D] Re: Dream?


=20=20=20=20
My progress is about 10%=20

http://img-fotki.yandex.ru/get/4808/astr73.4a/0_726ff_e974bdd4_XXXL.jpg

4 cells and a middle layer around them are solved.

Andrey

--- In 4D_Cubing@yahoogroups.com, "Matthew" wrote:
>
> Thought I would chip in to this discussion, since I have solved a small=
portion of this puzzle a few months ago (and I may actually try and finish=
it sometime). The preference on which feature is best really depends on ho=
w you solve it. Personally, I doubt I'll use any macros during the solve, I=
'll just use blockbuilding for most of it then reduce it to a megaminx for =
the last face, which shouldn't really require any macros. However, I reckon=
solving without piece finding is just insanity, there are just far too man=
y pieces to find them manually. I'm curious about whether anyone else who h=
as solved part (or all) of the puzzle in is the same situation, or at least=
a similar one. Good luck with the solve Eduard :).
>=20
> Matt
>=20



=20=20
------=_NextPart_000_0011_01CBD2B9.D0DEDBC0
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable



>


Wow, clearly more than my 3.17 o/oo &=
nbsp;=20
;-)

Ed

 

style=3D"BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-RIGHT: =
0px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
----- Original Message -----

style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial; BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; font-color: black">Fro=
m:
=20
href=3D"mailto:andreyastrelin@yahoo.com">Andrey
To: ps.com=20
href=3D"mailto:4D_Cubing@yahoogroups.com">4D_Cubing@yahoogroups.com
<=
/DIV>
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2011 5=
:48=20
PM

Subject: [MC4D] Re: Dream?


 =20


------=_NextPart_000_0011_01CBD2B9.D0DEDBC0--