Can someone who made MC4D make a download-able MC2D from 2^2 to 21^2?
I think it'll be nice, especially for people who can't solve 3^3 or for peo=
ple who just want to take a break from the MC4D/5D/7D madness.
That would be me but MC2D is most interesting for analysis of its
incredibly small state graph than it is as a puzzle, with or without
large edge lengths. If you need a break from the higher-dimensional
puzzles I suggest that you consider going outside. :-)
-Melinda
deustfrr wrote:
> Can someone who made MC4D make a download-able MC2D from 2^2 to 21^2?
> I think it'll be nice, especially for people who can't solve 3^3 or for people who just want to take a break from the MC4D/5D/7D madness.
N^2 may be interesting if you implement it as super-super-cube, for example=
, paint large square faces of the puzzle in 4 colors each (divide them by d=
iagonals).
Andrey
--- In 4D_Cubing@yahoogroups.com, Melinda Green
>
> That would be me but MC2D is most interesting for analysis of its=20
> incredibly small state graph than it is as a puzzle, with or without=20
> large edge lengths. If you need a break from the higher-dimensional=20
> puzzles I suggest that you consider going outside. :-)
>=20
> -Melinda
>=20
> deustfrr wrote:
> > Can someone who made MC4D make a download-able MC2D from 2^2 to 21^2?
> > I think it'll be nice, especially for people who can't solve 3^3 or for=
people who just want to take a break from the MC4D/5D/7D madness.
>
I don't understand. The faces of MC4D are lines, not polygons. Picture
please?
-Melinda
Andrey wrote:
> N^2 may be interesting if you implement it as super-super-cube, for example, paint large square faces of the puzzle in 4 colors each (divide them by diagonals).
>
> Andrey
>
>
> --- In 4D_Cubing@yahoogroups.com, Melinda Green
>
>> That would be me but MC2D is most interesting for analysis of its
>> incredibly small state graph than it is as a puzzle, with or without
>> large edge lengths. If you need a break from the higher-dimensional
>> puzzles I suggest that you consider going outside. :-)
>>
>> -Melinda
>>
>> deustfrr wrote:
>>
>>> Can someone who made MC4D make a download-able MC2D from 2^2 to 21^2?
>>> I think it'll be nice, especially for people who can't solve 3^3 or for people who just want to take a break from the MC4D/5D/7D madness.
In super-super-cube we need to restore initial position and orientation of =
all pieces including 0-colored. So Flatland version of such puzzle should b=
e semitransparent (and it'll not work there anyway), but we can look on it =
from the side. Possible initial painting and result of first twists are the=
re:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/4D_Cubing/photos/album/1962624577/pic/1294004=
249/view?picmode=3D&mode=3Dtn&order=3Dordinal&start=3D1&count=3D20&dir=3Das=
c
Andrey
--- In 4D_Cubing@yahoogroups.com, Melinda Green
>
> I don't understand. The faces of MC4D are lines, not polygons. Picture=20
> please?
> -Melinda
>=20
> Andrey wrote:
> > N^2 may be interesting if you implement it as super-super-cube, for exa=
mple, paint large square faces of the puzzle in 4 colors each (divide them =
by diagonals).
> >
> > Andrey
> >
> >
> > --- In 4D_Cubing@yahoogroups.com, Melinda Green
> >=20=20=20
> >> That would be me but MC2D is most interesting for analysis of its=20
> >> incredibly small state graph than it is as a puzzle, with or without=20
> >> large edge lengths. If you need a break from the higher-dimensional=20
> >> puzzles I suggest that you consider going outside. :-)
> >>
> >> -Melinda
> >>
> >> deustfrr wrote:
> >>=20=20=20=20=20
> >>> Can someone who made MC4D make a download-able MC2D from 2^2 to 21^2?
> >>> I think it'll be nice, especially for people who can't solve 3^3 or f=
or people who just want to take a break from the MC4D/5D/7D madness.
>