If 400 twists is a benchmark... then... I got 377 twists (in 4th attempt) :=
) It looks like it's time to stop and think a little.
Great job Matthew!
--0-1616505187-1273829205=:86449
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Well, for 500 twists there is Mat Young missing (he is even in your Hall Of=
Shortest) and I got sub-400 with my second solve (386 twists). Log-file ca=
n be seen on my profile on the MC4D wiki.
Happy Hypercubing, Klaus
________________________________
From: "thesamer@interia.pl"
To: 4D_Cubing@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wed, May 12, 2010 12:13:09 PM
Subject: Re: [MC4D] 3^4 news
=20=20
Great job Matthew!
I've looked on your solution: awesome start and later handling of the=20
solved parts.
Updated: http://www.ift. uni.wroc. pl/~rdurka/ rubik/hallofshor test/
Please correct me if I'm wrong:
People who broke 500 twists barrier on 3^4:
-Mattew Sheerin, Roice Nelson, Audrey Astrelin, Klaus Weidinger, me and=20
I believe there was somebody else
People who broke 400 twists barrier on 3^4:
-Mattew, Roice, Remi
251 barier is damn low... I think Roice has reached limit of his method=20
(so am I) but now Matthew provided a proof of new method so we will=20
see how much we can learn from it :)
Roice if you want to try a new record from the very beginning I propose=20
to use Matthew's scramble. That will be fun to see how much close we can=20
be in distinct solutions.
All the best,
R
=20
=20=20=20=20=20=20
--0-1616505187-1273829205=:86449
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
ad>t-size:12pt">
en in your Hall Of Shortest) and I got sub-400 with my second solve (386 tw=
ists). Log-file can be seen on my profile on the MC4D wiki.
Happy Hy=
percubing, Klaus
times new roman,new york,times,serif; font-size: 12pt;">a" size=3D"2">
From:pan> "thesamer@interia.pl" <thesamer@interia.pl>
e=3D"font-weight: bold;">To: 4D_Cubing@yahoogroups.com
PM
Subject: Re: [MC4D]=
3^4 news
=20=20=20=20=20=20
=20=20=20=20=20=20
I've looked on your solution: awesome start and later handling of the
solved parts.
Updated: roc.pl/%7Erdurka/rubik/hallofshortest/">http://www.ift. uni.wroc. pl/~rdurk=
a/ rubik/hallofshor test/
Please correct me if I'm wrong:
People who broke 500 twists barrier on 3^4:
-Mattew Sheerin, Roice Nelson, Audrey Astrelin, Klaus Weidinger, me and
>
I believe there was somebody else
People who broke 400 twists barrier on 3^4:
-Mattew, Roice, Remi
251 barier is damn low... I think Roice has reached limit of his method
>
(so am I) but now Matthew provided a proof of new method so we will
see how much we can learn from it :)
Roice if you want to try a new record from the very beginning I propose
>
to use Matthew's scramble. That will be fun to see how much close we can r>
be in distinct solutions.
All the best,
R
=20=20=20=20=20
--0-1616505187-1273829205=:86449--
--------------020302070409070808060909
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Why would you need a mechanism? It seems like the cross section of just
the stickers should be enough to be interesting. Of course the result
won't be more useful than an animated 2D cross section of a real Rubik's
cube but it would be fun to see.
-Melinda
On 10/27/2015 12:32 PM, mananself@gmail.com [4D_Cubing] wrote:
>
>
> You are talking about the cross section of the 4D Magic cube on the 3D
> subspace, right? I've never seen one.
>
> In order to make a proper cross section, one needs to design the
> internal mechanism of the 4D Magic Cube. I'm not aware of such a
> design. This is an interesting topic though. A simple extrapolation of
> the 3D mechanism may work.
>
> Nan
>
>
> ---In 4D_Cubing@yahoogroups.com,
>
> Does anyone have animation of a Rubik's hypercube passing through 3D
> space by any chance?
--------------020302070409070808060909
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
">
Why would you need a mechanism? It seems like the cross section of
just the stickers should be enough to be interesting. Of course the
result won't be more useful than an animated 2D cross section of a
real Rubik's cube but it would be fun to see.
-Melinda
You are talking about the cross section of the 4D Magic cube on
the 3D subspace, right? I've never seen one.
the internal mechanism of the 4D Magic Cube. I'm not aware of
such a design. This is an interesting topic though.=C2=A0 style=3D"word-spacing:normal;line-height:1.25;">A simple
extrapolation of the 3D mechanism may work.=C2=A0
---In ing@yahoogroups.com">4D_Cubing@yahoogroups.com, k-rfc2396E" href=3D"mailto:llamaonacid@..."><llamaonacid@...> wro=
te
:
Rubik's hypercube passing through 3D space by any chance?
--------------020302070409070808060909--
--001a11c25bc27af57e05235a1313
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi,
The piece finding functionality on Magic120Cell has two modes, depending on
whether you left or right click. Ctrl + Shift + *right* click does what
you are looking for.
Cheers,
Roice
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 10:24 AM, llamaonacid@gmail.com [4D_Cubing] <
4D_Cubing@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
>
>
> Instead of doing Ctrl + Shift + left click to find where the piece goes I
> would also like to have a feature that tells me where is the piece that
> goes in the clicked region.
>
>=20
>
--001a11c25bc27af57e05235a1313
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable