Thread: "Amelioration to the MC4D"

--- In 4D_Cubing@yahoogrou ps.com, David Smith wrote:
> I also do speedcubing, but my times are probably not close to yours
>- I average around a minute.

Well, if you give a look in the WCA database, you'll see my times at
Brussels Summer Open: I averaged at 57 s, which is in fact quite close
to your times.

Thibaut.

=20














=20=20=20=20=20=20
--0-1754425906-1221649556=:6458
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii

Wow... I never considered that my times would be tournament-worthy!  I use a 2-look F2L and a 4-look LL!  I could definitely get faster by learning F2L and PLL, but my biggest weakness is the cross.   All the Best, David --- On Wed, 9/17/08, thibaut.kirchner <thibaut.kirchner@yahoo.fr> wrote: From: thibaut.kirchner <thibaut.kirchner@yahoo.fr> Subject: Re: [MC4D] Thibaut Kirchner To: 4D_Cubing@yahoogroups.com Date: Wednesday, September 17, 2008, 4:08 AM --- In 4D_Cubing@yahoogrou ps.com, David Smith <djs314djs314@ ...> wrote: > I also do speedcubing, but my times are probably not close to yours >- I average around a minute. Well, if you give a look in the WCA database, you'll see my times at Brussels Summer Open: I averaged at 57 s, which is in fact quite close to your times. Thibaut.

--0-1754425906-1221649556=:6458--

Thibaut,

That's a very good suggestion. It wouldn't be a trivial change because
we want to support more puzzle types and therefore this sort of feature
belongs in the core polygon generation code. Also I tend to only work on
this in spurts between jobs and don't know when the next chance will
happen but I like this idea very much, especially because it would be
very helpful for more complicated puzzles.

-melinda

thibaut.kirchner wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I haven't read the old messages, therefore I don't know if this has
> already been suggested, and apologize in advance if this is the case,
> but here is my suggestion:
> What about adding to MC4D a tool to show / hide n-stickered pieces for
> each value of n (as there is in Magic 120-Cell)?
> I believe this could be useful to solve the 3^4, and much more to
> solve the 4^4 and higher-sized hyercubes.